A court official has rejected Drake's defamation lawsuit targeting the music corporation over Kendrick Lamar’s song the diss record.
Judge the court’s judge ruled that Lamar's lyrics, which claimed the artist and his associates of being "pedophiles", were "nonactionable opinion" and cannot be considered libelous.
The Canadian rapper filed the lawsuit in January, accusing Universal Music Group, the music company representing both artists, of defamatory conduct by permitting the song to be published and marketed, stating it disseminated a "untrue and harmful story".
Drake's spokesperson said he intended to appeal the decision. UMG said it was pleased with the result and was looking forward to resuming its collaboration with the rapper.
The diss song, which was first dropped in spring 2024, was broadly viewed as the decisive blow in an continuing feud between the rival rappers.
It has emerged as the most successful track of the rapper’s career, having received five Grammys and being one of the most-discussed moments of his Super Bowl half-time show in early 2025.
In a detailed ruling, the judge called the row between the rappers "the most infamous rap battle in the history of rap music".
"The artists' seven-track rap battle was a 'war of words' that was the subject of substantial media scrutiny and online discourse," the judge noted.
"While the accusation that plaintiff is a pedophile is undoubtedly a grave allegation, the wider backdrop of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the average audience to believe that 'Not Like Us' imparts truthful statements about the claimant."
She also noted that, in an previous track, Drake had "dared his rival to make the pedophile claims" that featured in Not Like Us.
On the track Taylor Made Freestyle, the rapper used the AI-generated voice of the late rapper to give Lamar advice on how to win the rap battle.
"Talk about him likin' young girls, that's a gift from me," the track suggested.
"Against this backdrop in which such lines as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be assessed," wrote Judge Vargas.
"The parallel in the wording suggests strongly that this lyric is a clear reference to the artist’s own words in the prior song."
Drake, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not sue his rival in the lawsuit.
His lawyers accused UMG of launching "an effort to create a viral hit" out of a track that made the "untrue claim that the artist is a criminal paedophile, and to imply that the public should resort to vigilante justice in retaliation".
Ruling against Drake, Judge Vargas said fans would not expect "truthful accounts" from a musical attack "replete with profanity, insults, violent implications, and exaggerated statements."
She pointed out that Drake himself had engaged in similar language, referencing a line in which the star "strongly" implied that "Lamar is a domestic abuser", and a separate instance where Drake "claims that he 'heard' that one of his rival’s children may not be his biological offspring."
Regarding Lamar's song, Judge Vargas said: "Although seemingly factual claims may assume the character of subjective views... when made in public debate, heated labour dispute, or similar situations in which an listener may expect the use of epithets, passionate language or exaggeration."
Reacting to the dismissal, a label representative said: "From the beginning, this lawsuit was an insult to every creative and their creative expression and should not have seen the light of day."
"We're pleased with the judge’s ruling and look forward to continuing our partnership successfully promoting Drake's music and supporting his career," the representative continued.
A spokesperson for the musician said the rapper planned to appeal the decision, "and we look forward to the Court of Appeals examining it".
Lamar has yet to issue a statement on the case.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino slot reviews and strategy development.